Wednesday, 16 November 2016

Ex_Machina research

Ex_Machina research
Producer - Andrew Macdonald and Allon Reich
Director - Alex Garland
Cast - Alicia Vikander, Domhnall Gleeson, Oscar Isaac, Sonoya Mizuno
Budget - $15 million
Locations - Valldal Valley in Norway and Pinewood Studios
Technology - Visual effects company Double Negative worked on the creation and production of Ava using advanced motion tracking technology
Number of screens (opening weekend) - 1,255 screens
Number of screens (peak number) - 2,004 screens
Box office figures - $36.9 million
  1. The issues raised by media ownership in contemporary media practice; The films production companies were Film 4 productions and DNA films, these are relatively small productions companies so this proves that small production companies can make successful films as the box office doubled the amount it cost to make the film.
  2. The importance of cross media convergence and synergy in production, distribution and marketing; Distribution and marketing are both very important because without marketing, no one will know about the film or buy it, distribution is used to show films in lots of cinemas or theatres etc to make it accessible for people to buy and watch it. The synergy that was used in production was Ava's Tinder and Instagram account.
  3. The technologies that have been introduced in recent years at the levels of production, distribution, marketing and exchange; Universal Studios used their size and popularity to advertise the film, they used posters, trailers, and social media to promote the new film. For this film they worked with an internet dating site 'Tinder' to create an account for Ava which will then send a link to the films Instagram page. This is a new type of advertising to promote the new film.
  4. The significance of proliferation in hardware and content for institutions and audiences; The way we buy films has changed as films are available to rent, download, Blu-Ray and internet streaming. This has influenced the way films are being made, for example, Ex Machina is available on Blu-Ray which means the film has been made to look high quality when viewed via DVD.
  5. The importance of technological convergence for institutions and audiences; The film companies would have had contacts with marketing organisations, this was the film would have lots of advertising in major cities, advertising includes trailers and posters. The way Ex Machina was distributed over social media could be a reason why Ex Machina did so well as many people have social media which meant that they would see the advertising of the film.
  6. The issues raised in the targeting of national and local audiences (specifically, British) by international or global institutions; To appeal to audiences in different countries, they release the trailer in a variety of different languages for different countries to watch. This method worked because Ex Machina made double the budget with the box office. In the UK and US. posters and social media largely contributed to the films marketing campaign.
  7. The ways in which the candidates’ own experiences of media consumption illustrate wider patterns and trends of audience behaviour I think these developments are good because they are a good way of getting peoples attentions to watch the film. The way they used social media was clever; making the main a character a tinder profile gives the character a real personality as they have social media. Posters are also good because they are in places where people can see and want to read if it is presented well.

Tuesday, 15 November 2016

Film Piracy 2



Hypothetically, two movies come out on the same day: The Wolf of Wall Street and the new Transformers. You are allowed to see one in an IMAX theatre and you will illegally download the other one online. Most people would choose Transformers over The Wolf of Wall Street due to the fact that there are robot dinosaurs and everyone else is going to see it in theatres. Those robot dinosaurs will look a lot cooler in a theatre rather than on a laptop. Many people then realized how lacking the movie really was after walking out of their local theatre's showing of Transformers: Age of Extinction. Meanwhile, many of the same people went on to watch The Wolf of Wall Street online to realize that it was actually a really good movie. Most people don’t realize that this is at all a problem, and at first glance it’s not. However, after more in-depth research, the problem soon becomes apparent. Transformers: Age of Extinction only gained an 18% rating on Rotten Tomatoes (Transformers, Rotten Tomatoes), one of the most critical and most trusted film-review sites online. The Wolf of Wall Street, however, gained a 77% rating on the same site (Wolf of Wall Street, Rotten Tomatoes). It was also nominated for five different Academy Awards. The Wolf of Wall Street is clearly the better film. Yet, besides the fact that Transformers was clearly not a great film, it somehow managed to be named the highest grossing film worldwide of 2014 and earned over one billion dollars in the Box Office (2014 Worldwide Grosses). The Wolf of Wall Street went on to be the most pirated film of 2014 with over 30 million illegal downloads (Spangler, 1) and didn’t even gross $117 million, giving the producers and the studio under $17 million after the production cost, which is not a much of a profit at all for such a high-budget film.

Piracy has become more of a problem in the past decade than it ever has before, specifically movie piracy. In fact, a study from Columbia University came out recently that said at least 45% of US citizens pirate movies actively, but that number bumps up to 70% if you include the younger demographics as well (Mick, 2). This act of pirating is growing more and more common every year and most people do it mindlessly, not realizing what it costs. Everyone has seen the text at the beginning of movies saying “Piracy is not a victimless crime,” and this is completely true. Piracy is extremely harmful to the movie industry and its effects are larger than anyone could imagine.

But Where Do These Pirated Movies Come From?
There are many different ways that people pirate movies. One of the most classic ways people pirate is by “leaking” them. This involves a person going into a movie theatre with a camera or a phone and recording the movie as it plays. It is usually a poor quality, but many people still download these recordings anyways instead of going to see it in a theatre. This usually occurs when it is only in theatre since that is the only version most people are able to see. Sometimes these leaks occur before the movie is even premiered, often because it is filmed during a special premier before the opening night. This is referred to as a pre-release, and they tend to result in a 19% decrease in how much the movie makes at the Box Office (Hart, 2). Many people defend pre-releases because it gives a movie more publicity so more people would want to see it, but the facts state otherwise. Leaking a movie that’s in the theatres always tends to decrease how much the movie makes regardless of when it is released and sometimes even leads to the movie not even making as much as there was put into it.

One of the other common ways for a movie to be pirated is for it to be digitally hacked. This one has become more common lately as technology improves. One of the most extreme and recent examples was the Sony hacking. Though some people will claim that Sony faked the hacking, evidence shows that they were legitimately hacked. During this hacking, many of Sony’s movies were released illegally online, such as Annie and Fury (Note: Annie had not even been released yet). A hacking involves someone digitally cracking into the studio or company’s computer system and taking the movie from their files. This logically would actually decrease a movie’s Box Office revenue by even more than someone’s recording of the movie would because it’s a better quality.

There are more ways to watch a pirated movie other than just downloading it online. In fact, some people tend to start their own pirating businesses. It’s very inexpensive and easy for a person to start one of these businesses. More recently, people only need to buy a bunch of blank DVD’s, the same amount of DVD cases and a computer that can burn a DVD. From there, they must find a source to get the pirated movies from. Sometimes they will personally film them in a theatre, or find a hacked or leaked version online and download it. After that, all they need to do is download the stolen films onto their blank DVD’s and sell them to anyone who is willing to purchase it. Within a short amount of time, this person has made a great deal of money that should have gone to the movie studios.

What Kind of Effect Does it Have?
Most people would just say that pirating has a small effect on the industry and that the studios already have enough money. They believe watching a movie online isn’t going to hurt anyone. The Motion Picture Association of America looked into this belief and discovered that piracy costs around $20.5 billion annually in the United States alone (Plumer, 2). In fact, a study back in 2005 estimated that a 10% decrease in worldwide piracy, including both film and music, over the course of four years would add 1.5 million jobs, $64 billion in taxes and $400 billion in economic growth (Kai-Lung). That, however, was ten years ago and is outdated. Those numbers are likely to be much higher today due to inflation and an increase in popularity of the film industry. This means that the studios are making much smaller amounts of money than they should be making from their films due to piracy.

Quit Talking Numbers. How Does it Effect My Movie Experience?
The decrease in money from studios will often decrease the quality of other movies and even sequels, but more often it will decrease the quantity. A studio is much more likely to throw all of their money into the next big franchise sequel than give half of it to the franchise and the other half to a movie like Twelve Years a Slave simply because Twelve Years a Slave won’t sell as well in theatres as the franchise movie will. Movie studios and production companies don’t look at reviews and DVD sales nearly as much as they look at the Box Office Revenue, or how much it makes in the theatre.
In many cases, piracy of a film will even damage the likeliness of a franchise sequel. For example, the Kick-Ass movies came to an end due to lack of funding from piracy. According to ChloĆ« Grace Moretz who stars as “Hit-Girl” in the series, Kick-Ass 2 was one of the most pirated films of 2013 despite having an extremely low Box Office Revenue (Highfill). Because of this, the plans for the third movie in the series have been cancelled. Whether or not you like the Kick-Ass series, it is clear that piracy has become a serious problem and will only continue to damage the film industry.

What About New Movies That Aren't Franchises Yet?
It is not franchise movies that need to be worried about, though; it is the movies by the independent filmmakers. Due to the increase in film piracy, production companies and movie studios are now much less likely to loan money out to an independent filmmaker with an idea than they are to a team of writers and producers working on a Harry Potter spin-off. When people think of the term ‘independent filmmaker’, they think of a man in his 20’s with an Associates Degree in Theatre that wrote a screenplay in two weeks. Though these people are independent filmmakers, I refer to the higher kind of independent filmmakers that actually make Oscar nominated films, but take out enormous loans to do so. Now, due to piracy, no matter how many Oscars their movie is nominated for, many filmmakers are having to foreclose their houses or take out further loans from a bank to make up for the losses in the Box Office for their film due to piracy. It also means that the studios do not get their money back that they invested with and therefore stop funding films without promises of success like Birdman or The Theory of Everything, both of whom won Oscars this year.
Now Let's Think More Economically...
The loss of money affects more than just the filmmakers and studios, however. It helps the entire economy grow due to tax and job increase. Pirating less films will mean that the studios will get more money, which leads to more movies, which employs people like hairdressers, electricians, actors, costume designers and countless other occupations. This will add more jobs to the United States and will also add more tax money to help the country.

But Is It Really Stealing?
Many people argue that piracy is not illegal because they are not technically stealing anything. Though they are not physically taking away anything from anyone, they are stealing intellectual property. Just because you can’t hold a movie file in your hands does not mean that it is not someone’s property. Downloading a film online is the equivalent of stealing a movie from a movie store. It may not come in the same fancy case as a movie at the store, but it still carries the same contents. By pirating a film, you are stealing the money that should have been paid had you watched the movie legally. You do not have a right to watch whatever movies you want to watch without having to pay for them just as I do not have a right to walk into the local Dollar General and eat their candy bars without paying first. As much as people may argue it, film piracy is stealing. It is not your property, so it is not yours to take without paying for it first.

Going Back to my Original Example at the Beginning of All of This...
The Wolf of Wall Street was 2014’s most pirated movie with over 30 million piracies worldwide. Let’s do the math to see how much money piracy actually robbed this movie of had these people gone to see it in a theatre instead. In 2014, the average price of a movie ticket in the United States was $8.17 (Linshi, 1). When a person goes to see a movie in the theatre, the money spent on the ticket goes to two different places. It is split between the movie studio and the movie theatre, with more going to the theatre the longer the movie has been out (Campea). For the purposes of now, let’s average that overall the theatre and the studio would each get 50% of the ticket price. Now for the part with the actual math. If each illegal download of The Wolf of Wall Street, which more specifically evens out to around 30,035,000 downloads (Spangler, 1) equals one movie ticket that costs $8.17, and the movie studio only gets half of the amount from each movie ticket, that results in about $122,692,975 that was robbed from Paramount Pictures for just that one movie. That amount stolen was more than the movie actually made in the Box Office, and that is assuming that only one person watched each illegal download. Several of those downloads were most likely copied onto multiple different blank DVD’s and given out to others to watch illegally. That is even more money that was robbed from The Wolf of Wall Street. In the Box Office, the movie barely broke even out of how much they spent making the film. These numbers would have helped the studio, the filmmakers and the crew a lot more in order to make even more Oscar nominated movies. Unfortunately, these thirty million people seemed to overlook that.

Now the Real Question: How Do We Stop Piracy?
It all starts at home, just like it takes a spark to start a fire. Many people argue that “everyone is watching movies illegally online, so why is it different if I do it?” Well the same argument could again go for people that steal candy bars from a store. It may cost more than you like and others may do it, but it is not your property to steal. Like voting, if just one person takes a stand against piracy it will make a difference. Simply quit pirating movies or watching them online. There are many different excuses people use about watching movies online illegally, but it does not override the fact that it is illegal. Even streaming movies online is illegal if it is not authorized by the studio that made the film. If you aren’t willing to pay to watch the film, you aren’t allowed to watch it. This is the way the industry works.

What Can The theatres Do?
A way for movie theatres to prevent piracy is to change their types of projectors. In the past, the government came up with a way to prevent the filming of a movie in the theatres. They did this by projecting an infrared spectrum over the projected film. This infrared image was not visible to the audience, but it would make the video on the camera someone brought into film the movie into a very low quality that would make the video almost unbearable to watch. Since then technology has improved to attempt to improve the quality of the filmed video regardless of the infrared. Though this has worked to an extent, film pirates have not yet fully recovered from the addition of the infrared. Only more research will be able to help improve the projectors so that this does not happen anymore.

What Happens if Someone gets Caught?!
When it all comes down to it, one of the major reasons you should avoid pirating movies is that its an enormous risk. Since it is illegal, there are certainly punishments for those that choose to break this law. These punishments are severe. For example, if a person is convicted of a misdemeanour in piracy, as in they only downloaded or uploaded a small amount of movies without the owner’s consent, the person would be punished with up to a year of prison time and would have a fine of up to $100,000, depending on the extent of the piracy. That, however, is just for a small offense. For someone that downloads or uploads movies illegally without the owner’s consent in large amounts will be charged with a felony. The punishment of this crime is up to 5 years of imprisonment and up to $250,000 in fines. The fine, though, can be more. In some cases, the fine is set as double what the person gained for pirating the films if they made money off of it, or it set as double the amount of money the person cost the studios he or she stole from (AlanS). In any of these cases, it is clear that movie piracy is not worth the risk.


Piracy is Clearly an Enormous Threat
Filmmakers are in danger of losing their jobs and the movie theatres are in danger of only showing films like Transformers sequels and Terminator reboots. Helping the film industry does not just entail not illegally watching a movie, it also entails going to see those movies in a theatre to reverse the mistakes made by those who don’t realize the consequences. Some of the greatest films do not get the proper credibility in the theatres because people are too distracted by other films or because people would think it’s smarter to illegally watch it on their computer than paying to see it in a theatre. As stated earlier, this has many more consequences than these people would think, such as taking away jobs, taking over $20.5 billion from the US film industry and decreasing both the quantity and quality of the very movies they are downloading. In addition, is it really worth spending five years of your life in prison just because you didn’t want to pay to watch a movie? It’s time to stop pirating and to stop making excuses for watching a movie illegally online. Film is a form of art. People use it to tell their stories.


LINK to original source

Film Piracy



The movie industry excels in selling dreams. But since the dawn of the digital revolution, there is one narrative they've consistently and conspicuously failed to sell: that piracy is theft and consumers who indulge ought to feel guilty about it. Recent research by Ipsos suggests that almost 30% of the UK population is active in some form of piracy, either through streaming content online or buying counterfeit DVDs. Such theft costs the UK audiovisual industries about £500m a year.

LINK to rest of article

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

The Big Six




Major Film Studios
A major film studio is a film producer and production company that releases a substantial number of films annually.
The Big Six film studios are:
1. Warner Bros. Pictures. Comprising a whopping 19.7 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Warner Bros. Pictures is the biggest player in the film industry. Securing the rights to major films like Harry Potter, Superman, Batman, The Matrix and Star Wars have made Warner Bros. the No. 1 name in the business.
2. Paramount Pictures. With 15.5 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Paramount Pictures continues to be one of the most successful film production companies in the world. Star Trek, War of the Worlds, the Mission Impossible series, Transformers and Tropic Thunder are just a few of the popular films produced by Paramount Pictures.
3. Walt Disney. One of the most renowned film production companies in the history of the business, Walt Disney now holds 15.3 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). With highly successful movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, National Treasure, Meet the Robinsons and Enchanted, there's no doubt that Disney will continue to play a key role in the industry for years to come.
4. Columbia Pictures. Comprising 12.9 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Columbia Pictures remains a big player in the business. Some of this company's recent successes include Casino Royale, The Da Vinci Code, the Spider-Man series and Step Brothers.
5. Universal Studios. 12.2 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures) belongs to Universal Studios, which continues to make millions for the film industry. With major hits like the Bourne series (Bourne Identity, Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum), The American Pie series, Knocked Up, American Gangster and The Incredible Hulk, it's very clear that Universal Studios knows what it takes to make money in this industry.
6. 20th Century Fox. Also known as "Twentieth Century Fox," this highly successful movie production company makes up 11.9 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). Some of the biggest and most successful movies from this empire include the X-Men series, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, Star Wars Episodes II and III, and the Fantastic Four.
Roughly 9/10 films in the UK are seen as a result of these distributors

Ex Machina Review

The Turing test is an experiment to challenge a machine's ability to show intelligence that is similar to a human and see if the human testing the computer think it is a human or not. This investigation is the main part of Ex Machina, a film in which Caleb (Domhnall Gleeson) is invited to participate in such an experiment to test an A.I made by CEO Nathan (Oscar Isaac).
Caleb is a brilliant coder working for Bluebook, the world's most popular search engine. He wins a competition to spend a week with the company's owner Nathan, a genius who retreated to an Alaskan estate and has barely been heard from since. Nathan is shown to like exercising and drinking when Caleb arrives but his true obsession is to create the world's first artificial intelligence. Nathan greets the competition winner with sweating intensity and tells Caleb not to be freaked out by the strangeness of the situation and suggest they act like old friends. Nathan tells Caleb that he will be at the centre of "the greatest scientific event of all-time" and if he doesn't sign the form that he was given then he will regret it for the rest of his life. Persuaded, Caleb signs the document and is given a tour of the premises which isn't a house but a research facility. And on discovering that his pass can only open some doors but not others it suddenly seems less like a research facility and more like a prison.
Caleb ignores the fact that the facility might actually be prison and focuses on the job in hand; the Turing test. When he first lays eyes on Ava, the A.I, she takes his breath away. Played by Alicia Vikander, Nathan makes Ava look like the perfect artificial intelligence with her body in human shape but with much of its mechanics exposed, her face a depiction of femininity. A series of 'sessions' follow between Caleb and Ava, the pair interacting and asking each other questions as Nathan sits in isolation elsewhere, observing the two on many screens. At the end of each sitting Nathan asks Caleb what he thinks of her and how she is doing in the test. Nathan is obviously testing a lot more that Alan Turing's theory, but we are unaware of his intentions as Caleb is when it comes to knowing his true purpose.
As the sessions progress, proceedings take a dark turn as all three characters use lies and manipulation as a means to achieve the very different ends they are after; the challenging sci-fi slowly morphing into thriller. The three actors play their roles very well in question (as well as its one intriguing non-speaking star Kyoko), Oscar Isaac builds up his charm and charisma to good use as Nathan. Isaac achieves making Nathan both likeable and terrifying. Domhnall Gleeson fills the character Caleb with an innocence and vulnerability which makes it easy for people to manipulate and use him for others' gain. Gleeson fills Caleb with a decency and morality that makes the audience love him. Alicia Vikander has an outstanding performance playing Ava, giving the character a strange quality that catches the eyes of the audience. She puts her training as a ballerina to good use through both Ava’s stillness and the manner in which she moves, the visual effects work is remarkable as you almost forget she is human playing a machine.
To conclude, I give this remarkably-put-together film an 8/10 because the visual effects are outstanding and the characters are played amazingly. However, the only fault I would depict is the ending. Although some people might like the type of ending that is given, I for one don't like cliff hangers and like to know exactly what happened without leaving the film with a lot of questions. Alex Garland has produced an astonishing film with astounding performances of the characters, this film would be god for anyone interested in sci-fi/ thriller films and are curious to know where technology is taking us.

Wednesday, 12 October 2016

Writing an essay

Discuss the ways in which the extract constructs the representation of REGIONAL IDENTITY using the following: (50 marks)
  • Camera shots, angles, movement and composition
  • Editing
  • Sound
  • Mise en scene
EAA: Explanation, analysis, argument (20 marks)
EG: Use of examples (20 marks)
T: Terminology (10 marks)



The establishing shot is of an outdated doctor's surgery, lacking many of the modern items one would expect to see, this cultural code immediately positions the audience to regard the countryside as 'behind' in terms of technology and other advancements - this is a common stereotype of the countryside. The use of a wide angle allows the audience to see the contrast between the suit wearing Doc Martin (who represents the 'city') and the two boiler suit wearing tradesman (who represent the countryside). Doc Martin is positioned higher in the frame, which could connote power and authority, whilst one of the two workers appear lazy; he is seated, overweight and eating. The room appears uncared for, it is lit using natural soft key lighting and through the use of mise en scene we can see that there are boxes piled up.

Moreover, the insert shot is of an old fashioned police office which shows an officer is hovering, implying he has free time to clean because the countryside is quiet and crime free. Through the use of mise en scene we can see that the computer is off which could demonstrate there is little work to be done and the fact that it isn't an updated computer might show that there is no need to because there might not be a lot of work to do in the countryside. The use of the tilt on the police man portrays how important he is which is then overpowered by Doc Martin as he is from the city which makes him significant, an eyeline match highlights that Doc Martin and the police officer share the same power. The mid-close up on the police officer's face indicates the surprise when Doc Martin enters the room, this may illustrate the rarity of people entering the office.

Further more, the medium close up shot is of Doc Martin and a woman trying to talk to him. Doc Martin is closer to the camera which could portray the power he has over the woman, it also could imply that he doesn't want to talk to her as he has carried on walking away. The mise en scene shows that the woman has a car which could infer that she might be lazy to walk around or that she has a lot of money to buy a car, when they walk the mise en scene changes to mountains and the ocean which is a stereotypical view of a countryside, the sound of seagulls in the background as they walk are also a stereotypical view of the countryside as it is near the sea and normally has lots of seagulls around it.

In addition, the medium shot is of a woman calling Doc Martin to help her carry vegetables. The old woman is closer to the camera which could indicate the power she has over Doc Martin, and because she is old, it positions the audience to see that she is wise which then is proven to be correct when she tells Doc Martin the teachers name because she knows everyone. Through the use of mise en scene we can see cottages which is a common stereotype of a countryside to have cottages as they are old fashioned, we can aslo see a school which is bigger than both Doc Martin and the old woman to imply that schools are important. The vegetables in the van could connote that she works on a farm or grows vegetables which is also a stereotypical view of people from the countryside, her attire could also show this.


I have under analysed terms for sound and not used any of Roland Barthes narrative codes. I could have put more camera angles in my essay and used more regional identity angles that are shown in the clip of Doc Martin. I haven't mention many editing techniques that was used in the clip and I have only included one thing about the sound used in the background.

Questions for Star Wars: The Force Awakens

1.  Who owns Lucasfilm? Lucasfilm is owned by Disney, they bought it for around $4 billion.
2.  Who formed Lucasfilm? George Lucas formed Lucasfilm, he is an American film maker and entrepreneur.
3.  What year was Lucasfilm formed? 1971
4.  Who is the president of Lucasfilm? With Micheline Chau's departure, senior executives for each of the Lucasfilm divisions will report directly to Kathleen Kennedy.
5.  What other major films have they worked on? As well as Star Wars, Lucasfilm has worked on Indiana Jones.
6. How much was Lucasfilm sold for? Around $4 billion
7.  Who wrote Star Wars: The Force Awakens? George Lucas wrote the film Star Wars: The Force Awakens
8. Who directed Star Wars: The Force Awakens? J.J Abrams directed the film, he is an American film director, producer and screenwriter. He is known for work in the genres of action, drama, and science fiction
9.  What other major films is the director responsible for? J.J Abrams also direct the sequel to Star Trek, Star Trek Into Darkness
10. How many Star Wars films have there been so far (list them)? 
Star Wars (1997)
The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
The Return of the Jedi (1983)
The Phantom Menace (1999)
Attack of the Clones (2002)
Revenge of the Sith (2005)
The Force Awakens (2015)
Episode VIII (2017)
11. How much money have they all made at the global box office? Here are some examples of how much money the global box office make in the years 1900-2016         
$ 2788.0 Avatar (2009)
$ 2186.8 Titanic (1997)
$ 2066.0 Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015)
$ 1670.4 Jurassic World (2015
$ 1519.6 The Avengers (2012)
$ 1516.0 Furious Seven (2015)
$ 1405.4 Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)
$ 1341.5 Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows: Part 2 (2012)
$ 1276.5 Frozen (2013)
$ 1215.4 Iron Man 3 (2013)
$ 1163.5 Minions (2015)
$ 1152.7 Captain America: Civil War (2016)
$ 1123.7 Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)
$ 1122.0 Jurassic Park (1993)
$ 1119.9 The Lord of The Rings: The Return of The King (2003)
$ 1108.6 Skyfall (2012)
$ 1104.0 Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014)
$ 1084.9 The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
$ 1066.2 Pirates of The Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006)
$ 1050.7 Toy Story 3 (2010)
$ 1045.7 Pirates of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011)
$ 1027.0 Star Wars: The Phantom Menace (1999)
$ 1025.5 Alice in Wonderland (2010)

$ 1023.1 Zootopia (2016)
$ 1021.1 The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)                                                                     TOTAL $33224.3
12.  When was the first Star Wars film released? May 25, 1977
13.  What does ILM stand for? Industrial Light and Magic
14.  What do ILM do? They create visual effects and CGI
15.  Who created ILM? George Lucas
16.  Why did they create ILM? For the production of the Star Wars franchise
17.  What do casting directors do? Casting Directors organize the casting of actors for all the roles in a film. This involves working closely with the director and producer to understand their requirements, and suggesting ideal artists for each role, as well as arranging and conducting interviews and auditions.
18.  Where were the first scenes for Star Wars: The Force Awakens filmed? The first scenes were filmed in the desert near Abu Dhabi
19.  What format was Star Wars: The Force Awakens shot on? 66mm IMAX
20.  What types of camera were used to film Star Wars: The Force Awakens? Kodak cameras were used to film Star Wars
21.  What studio was used to film a large portion of the film? Production for ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ was predominantly based at Pinewood Studios, where stars Harrison Ford, John Boyega and Daisy Ridley filmed a large portion of the film
22.  Where is the studio? Iver Heath, Buckinghamshire, England. Approximately 20 miles west of Central London
23.  What major franchise is famously filmed at this studio? The James Bond franchise and the Carry On films
24.  How does said franchise link to Star Wars: The Force Awakens? Daniel Craig, the main character in James Bond, played a storm trooper in the film Star Wars: The Force Awakens
25.  Who was the inspiration for the character Maz Kanata? The inspiration of Maz Kanata was J.J Abrams' old teacher Rose Gilbert
26.  What technology was used to create Maz Kanata? The medusa performance capture system
27.  Who played Maz Kanata & what other roles is she famous for? Lupita Nyong'o played Maz Kanata, she is also famous for Raksha in The Jungle Book, Gwen in Non-Stop etc.
28.  Who played General Snoke? Andy Serkis
29.  What is he renowned for in the movie business? He is renowned for playing Gollum in The Lord of The Rings
30.  Where was the final scene filmed? The last scene, involving the mysterious role of Mark Hamill, takes place in the Skellig Michael island in Ireland.
31.  Who composed the film score? John Williams composed the music for Star Wars
32.  How many Star wars films has he composed the music for? 6
33.  What other famous films has he created the music for? John Williams has also composed for the films: Jaws, E.T, Superman, Saving Private Ryan, Hook, Home Alone, and Star Wars I, II, III, VII and the VIII coming in 2017
34.  How many times did John Boyega audition for the film (according to JJ Abrams)?
35.  Over what period of time did these auditions occur? 7 months
36.  How many people operated B-B8? 3, one person operates the head, another operates the body's acceleration, and the last person operates the direction in which B-B8 goes
37.  What type of technology was the main version of B-B8? The ball is giant remote-control robot puppet very much like one called Sphero which was design by Bob Iger, the head is attached to the body with a magnet so that it doesn't fall off but also allows the body to move freely.
38.  What colour suit did the B-B8 operator wear? Green
39.  What did he have to wear such a suit? He had to wear a green suit because it is similar to the green screen that you can edit and put backgrounds on that aren't actually there. So he wears the green suit so that he can be edited to fit the background so it looks like B-B8 moves on his own.
40.  What type of special effects (SFX) were employed on Star Wars: The Force Awakens? CGI
41.  How many people were behind the monitor watching the scene when Han and Chewie returned to the Millenium Falcon? Around 200
42.  Why was Simon Pegg thanked in the credits for Star Wars: The Force Awakens? Because he helped make the film and he played a character.
43.  JJ Abrams shot part of Star Wars: The Force Awakens in IMAX. What is IMAX? IMAX is a technique of widescreen cinematography which produces an image approximately ten times larger than that from standard 35 mm film.
44.  How many IMAX screens was The film available on? Only 15 films in North America and 2 internationally are showing in the IMAX screens
45.  What was the age rating of the film in the UK? 12
46.  How much money did the UK government contribute to the production of Star Wars: The Force Awakens? (Express this figure as a percentage of the total cost and as a figure in pounds). £31.6 million - 15% financed by the UK government.
47.  How much was Harrison Ford paid to reprise his role of Han Solo? Around $25 million
48.  How much were Daisy Ridley and John Boyega paid? Between $100k to $300k